It seems to me that the folks attacking the
party nomination processes in both parties have shown themselves to be “fair weather”
democratic purists at best. Political decision making processes designed to
produce democratically accountable and substantively appropriate results are
particularly appropriate in our hyper-competitive and polarized political
environment; an environment that clearly incentivizes a flexible relationship,
to say the least, between one’s principals and interests.
Move over Jeff Jacoby, Eric Fehrnstrom’s appears to be gunning for your beat over at the Globe. A couple weeks back I gently debunked Fehrnstrom’s transparently weak argument that Trump could beat Clinton. This week, he has published an even more transparently weak attack on Hillary Clinton’s candidacy that I will herein debunk a bit less gently. Frankly, Mr. Fehrnstrom writes like a graduating senior taking a course pass-fail, though I’m not sure he deserves credit for giving it “the old college try.”
Filter view by: