February 01, 2016

Voters debate during a caucus of precinct 42 near Smithland, Iowa, Tuesday, Jan. 3, 2012. AP Photo

I am a fervent Ohio State football fan so I generally care about Iowa once a year – when playing the Hawkeyes means adding another “W” to the win column.  As a Political Scientist though, vocation demands that every four years my analytic attention turns toward Iowa and the presidential caucuses.  With the Iowa caucuses commencing this evening, I will not be alone. 

But why Iowa?  Iowans understandably enjoy the voice, money spent, and attention that being the first state to officially weigh-in on the presidential contest brings.  And, let’s be honest, it also helps them disassociate from Bachelor Chris in the public mind.  But amongst political scientists, journalists, and much of the American public a regular critique is that Iowa is simply too unrepresentative to wield such influence over who will be the nominees of the Democratic and Republican parties.  As Kevin McDermott succinctly penned, Iowa voters are “mostly white, largely rural, and older than the national norm.”  And they are.  Iowa is unrepresentative of the United States and Iowa caucus goers are even more divorced from the American populace.

And that’s exactly why Iowa is actually representative of our unrepresentative American electoral politics.  Iowa is the American election process on speed (if speed was made from ethanol).  Just look to the evidence:

  • Money Talks.  And It Only Talks to Certain States.  Over seventy million dollars has been spent in Iowa on political ads in this cycle alone.  That is about $22 per Iowan.  In the general election, citizens of states like Colorado, Ohio, and Florida will have far more spent on them by the eventual party nominees than those of us in solidly blue or red states.  The Electoral College means a select few states get spent heavily on and some citizens are reached out to over-and-over by party nominees while others are ignored.  Iowa only kicks off this trend.  The general election solidifies it.

  • Undue Interest Group Influence.  Ethanol!  Iowa and their ethanol.  There is a reason I did not major in chemistry.  Or farming.  Or whatever discipline governs the classification of ethanol.  But I do know quite a bit about electoral politics.  We can try and shame the farming industry in Iowa who has used their early influence to garner considerable federal subsidies for ethanol and even made sure it is mixed in gasoline.  Being first to caucus in the Presidential race is an awfully nice way to keep this gravy train running.  So we should be enraged by this inefficient farce, correct?  Spare me. Ethanol is cute compared to the undue policy and electoral influence the NRA, Planned Parenthood, Wall Street, unions, Big Tobacco, Goldman Sachs, and others will have given their spending in the 2016 general contest.  Here again, Iowa offers but a glimpse of what is to come post-conventions.

  • What Electoral Connection?  Love ‘em and Leave ‘em.  Anger is the word of the day in Presidential politics.  It seems to be motivating much of Trump’s rise and it, combined with disenchantment, has the Bernie crowd motivated and polling within the margin of error of HRC in Iowa.  As many a Christian evangelical will tell you, and ardent environmentalist will reaffirm, folks are sick of being wooed during the presidential contests by their respective party and then back-burnered once governing.  Iowa but amplifies this trend.  See ya again in 3ish years, Hawkeyes!  Come this evening, every candidate and news crew is outta Iowa.  So the disconnect between electioneering  and policymaking for ideological extreme members of the base is mirrored in the most stark terms in Iowa.

So, yeah, having Iowa vote first for President is odd.  Just like American Presidential elections.  As you watch the returns this evening, and are potentially driven to drink, remember Iowa is but the canary in the coal mine for our deeply unrepresentative American Presidential election process.

presidential politics, Iowa caucus, Election 2016, Iowa

Previous Post

Oh No! Could the Voters Decide the Presidential Nominations?

Next Post

Go to MassPoliticsProfs.org

comments powered by Disqus