Credit: Chayapon Bootboonneam / EyeEm
Those in the highest paying jobs are working longer hours than ever before. Meanwhile, the middle class is falling behind, as employers demand more qualifications from employees. America is supposed to be a meritocracy, but perhaps meritocracies - which aim for fairness - aren’t all they’re cracked up to be.
Daniel Markovits,and author of argues that meritocracy is actually dividing the country. And though the richest among us might be pleased that wealth is increasingly concentrated at the top, Markovits says: this system isn’t a benefit to anyone, including the 1%.
- According to Markovits, the post-WWII reinvention of American meritocracy has cost the middle class economic mobility. He says that in the past, a person may have been able to lead a stable life and work a well-paying job with just a high school diploma. But now, many jobs demand a level of education that fewer and fewer can afford. This, Markovits argues, has lead to stagnation, loss of income, and feelings of marginalization among the middle class.
- The top 1% of earners work over 50 hours a week, more than people at any other income level. In some professions, working 70 hours a week isn’t uncommon. For the elite, this translates into lots of money, but little time or energy to do much else.
- The solution lies in education, according to Markovits. He argues that if elite universities start increasing enrollment of students from lower income families, opportunity and mobility for the middle class will improve, and there will be decreasing pressure on those already in demanding jobs.
- NYT columnist and Columbia professor Thomas Edsall evaluates , what “merit” actually means, and if the way we’re measuring it makes sense.
- Working too hard isn’t just inconvenient. It can be bad for your health. according to Jeffrey Pfeffer, a professor at Stanford University.
- New Mexico has just announced a plan to .